Can you shoot a trespasser in philippines

1. Can you shoot a trespasser in philippines

It depends on a trespasser, if the trespasser is illegal, call to the nearest police station to get him/her, same to the legal :D

2. List of death penalty in the philippines

Answer:

kidnapping

Explanation:

3. Perspective of death penalty in the philippines

Answer:

Adopting the death penalty will mean spilling more blood in the name of Duterte's “drug war.” It will lead the Philippines to descend further into a rights-violating abyss. And the government will lose credibility and leverage to negotiate on behalf of Filipinos who face execution abroad.

4. Death penalty list of executions philippines

Answer:

LETHAL INJECTION

Explanation:

Death penalty alludes to the sentence of death forced by an official courtroom on a serious wrongdoer a capital offense. The death penalty is once in a while alluded to as the death penalty. Most death penalty cases include the execution of killers albeit the death penalty can likewise be applied for treachery, secret activities, and different violations.

The Death Penalty was "abrogated" under the 1987 Constitution. The Philippines turned into the main Asian nation to nullify the death penalty for all wrongdoings. All death sentences were decreased to antisocial nature perpetua or life detainment. In 1988, the military began campaigning for the inconvenience of the death penalty for wrongdoings perpetrated by the CPP-NPA.  

The death penalty is a definitive coldblooded, brutal and corrupting discipline. Reprieve goes against the death penalty in all cases no matter what paying little heed to who is denounced, the nature or conditions of the wrongdoing, culpability or guiltlessness or strategy for execution. Taking on the death penalty will mean spilling more blood for the sake of Duterte's "drug war." It will lead the Philippines to plummet further into a rights-abusing pit. President Rodrigo Duterte again pushed for the reimposition of the death penalty, determining the strategy for lethal injection, for horrifying wrongdoings identified with unlawful medications in his fifth Condition of the Country Address.  

The President, who has pursued a savage medication battle since he came into office in 2016 and pledged to battle guiltiness, said executions will assist with bringing down crime percentages in the country.

What is your Opinion for death penalty? Read more

https://brainly.ph/question/181271

#LETSSTUDY

5. What is the effect of death penalty in the Philippines

it had made people back then afraid, afraid of doing something wrong this has caused discipline among Filipinos.

6. Should the death penalty be legalized in the Philippines? Why?

In some cases, yes. It can be use for the safety of women, like in the cases of rape. Usually, minors are prone with this case. Well, for me, depending on what the situation, if he/she really deserve to be punish with that. yes, so bad people  can change before the death penalty is legalized

7. Should the death penalty be legalized in the Philippines? Why?

Answer:

Yes

Explanation:

The Philippines should legalize the death penalty because it is an effective deterrent against crime. It will also provide closure for the families of victims who have been waiting for justice for years. In addition, the death penalty serves as a warning to others who might be considering committing crimes. Furthermore, the Philippines will be able to show the world that they take crimes seriously and are not afraid to use the death penalty when necessary.

8. death penalty in the philippines advantage disadvantage answer​

Answer:

Death Penalty Pros and Conss

Advantages:

1. Deterrence: Supporters of the death penalty argue that it can act as a deterrent to potential criminals, as they may fear facing the ultimate punishment if caught.

2. Justice for victims and families: Some argue that the death penalty is a just punishment for serious crimes like murder, and that it can bring a sense of closure and justice to the families of victims.

3. Cost savings: In theory, it may be less expensive to execute a prisoner than to keep them in prison for life.

Disadvantages:

1. Risk of executing the innocent: There is always a risk that an innocent person could be executed, as the criminal justice system is not infallible. This risk is especially high in countries with weak judicial systems, where corruption and errors are more common.

2. Human rights concerns: Some people believe that the death penalty is cruel, inhumane, and degrading, and that it violates human rights.

3. Ineffectiveness: Critics argue that the death penalty is not an effective deterrent to crime, and that there is no evidence to suggest that it reduces crime rates.

4. Biases: There is a risk of biases in the implementation of the death penalty, including racial or ethnic biases, as well as biases based on social or economic status.

9. are you in favor of death penalty in the Philippines ? ​

Answer:

I am not in favor of death penalty for three reasons: Life is a gift from God, only God can take it, if the verdict was erroneous, you cannot bring back to life a dead person, let the person serve his term in prison and there give him a chance to transform to be better. Everyone deserves a second chance para magbagong buhay.

Answer:

YES

Explanation:

but the only one who will be punished by this are the people who truly deserves this.

10. are their case that death penalty should be legalized in the philippines?

Answer:

taga sisters of mary ni ba

Explanation:

The Philippines has ratified both the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), which bars a reintroduction of the death penalty, and its Second Optional Protocol, which is aimed explicitly at abolishing the punishment.

11. What are the pros of Death Penalty in the Philippines? ​

Explanation:

Death Penalty needs to be implemented in the Philippines. And here are the advantages.

It deters bad people to commit heinous crimes.

One reason supporters of the capital punishment are for death penalty is its effectiveness as a crime deterrent. According to the advocates for death sentencing, potential criminals will be scared to suffer such harsh punishment and as a result, they will be hesitant to commit crimes like rape and murder

It is what hardened criminals deserve.

Some of the crimes that are under capital punishment include murder and rape, depending on the country or state legalizing the practice. For pro-death penalty, there are criminals who are repeat offenders and not scared to rape and murder again, knowing they will only be imprisoned.

It reduces the number of committed crimes.

People who are for death penalty posit that without it, the number of major crimes like murder and homicide will escalate since bad elements will not be afraid to do whatever they want., from dealing drugs to killing other people. Without harsh punishments for their offenses, criminals will be taking advantage of weaker people and victims.

MOST IMPORTANTLY

The government need not spend for criminals who are murderers and such.

Death penalty costs the government less compared to the costs of life imprisonment because they will be given the expenses of food, health care and other costs that will sustain their lives. Some critics says that spending for people who committed such heinous crimes is impractical and just a waste of taxpayers’

Personally, we really care about the status of the Philippines especially the Filipinos' status of way of living. We don't want crimes anymore and we believe that this is the only way to change the corrupted country.

If this would be implemented, then we promise you all of these advantages to be fulfilled and a change in the budget for the government for other sectors.

12. What are the penalties for violating the IPR law of the Philippines ?​

Answer:

Under Philippine law, copyright infringement is punishable by the following: Imprisonment of between 1 to 3 years and a fine of between 50,000 to 150,000 pesos for the first offense. Imprisonment of 3 years and 1 day to six years plus a fine of between 150,000 to 500,000 pesos for the second offense.

Answer:

Under Philippine law, copyright infringement is punishable by the following: Imprisonment of between 1 to 3 years and a fine of between 50,000 to 150,000 pesos for the first offense. Imprisonment of 3 years and 1 day to six years plus a fine of between 150,000 to 500,000 pesos for the second offense.

make me brainleast

13. Authority of the president of the philippines to suspend the execution of a penalty

Answer:

It's good to suspend it because it gets discrimination from the people and causing its suspension

It's bad because the people who deserves it can't feel it

14. Inference about death penalty in the Philippines

Answer:

Philippines: The death penalty is an inhumane, unlawful and ineffective response to drugs

The adoption of a draft law by the Philippine House of Representatives to revive the death penalty sets the country on a dangerous path in flagrant violation of its international legal obligations, Amnesty International said today.

“The idea that the death penalty will rid the country of drugs is simply wrong. The resumption of executions will not rid the Philippines of problems associated with drugs or deter crime. It is an inhumane, ineffective punishment and is never the solution. The Philippines’ attempts to reintroduce it are clearly unlawful. This will just earn the country notoriety as one of the few countries to revive its horrific use,” said Champa Patel, Amnesty International’s Director for Southeast Asia and the Pacific.

Today, the House of Representatives of the Philippines adopted on its third and final reading of House Bill 4727, a measure put forward by President Duterte’s majority coalition to reintroduce the death penalty.

The idea that the death penalty will rid the country of drugs is simply wrong. The resumption of executions will not rid the Philippines of problems associated with drugs or deter crime. It is an inhumane, ineffective punishment and is never the solution. The Philippines’ attempts to reintroduce it are clearly unlawful

15. Who agreed the death penalty in the philippines?

president gloria macapagal arroyo.

16. When was death penalty implented in the philippines?

Answer:

1987

But such a development would represent a significant step back for the Philippines, which in 1987 became the first Asian nation to end capital punishment.

Explanation:

hope it helps

Answer:

But such a development would represent a significant step back for the Philippines, which in 1987 became the first Asian nation to end capital punishment.

Explanation:

Pa branliest

17. When was the death penalty abolished in the philippines?

[tex]{\huge{\red{\underline{\ \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: }}}}[/tex]

[tex]\bold{A\: \: N\: \: S\: \: W\: \: E\: \: R}[/tex]

[tex]\tt\green{ 1987}[/tex]

[tex] \\ [/tex]

[tex]\bold{S \: \: O \: \: L \: \: U \: \: T \: \: I \: \: O \: \: N}[/tex]

well to be exact,the death penalty has been abolished [tex]\tt\green{twice}[/tex] before - first in [tex]\tt\green{1987}[/tex] and then again in [tex]\tt\green{2006}[/tex] after being reinstated in 1993.

[tex]{\huge{\red{\underline{\ \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: \: }}}}[/tex]

18. Why was death penalty revived in the philippines?

Answer:

because daming tao Hindi sumosunod

19. pros reviving death penalty in the philippines​

It deters criminals from committing serious crimesIt is quicks, painless and humaneThe legal system constantly evolves to maximize justiceIt appeases the victim or the victim familiesIt is a cost-effective solution.

I hope it helps you :)

20. do you agree for death penalty in the Philippines?

no because god can only take lives

no ,everyone deserves to live even bad or good.

21. The death penalty if used in the Philippines will be ineffective and impractical.​

Answer: it depends

Explanation:

it depends, it will be ineffective if the suspect are not really the suspect, and also we as filipino's we are more religious and I think it will become impractical if the higher position will not use this death penalty or sanction properly.

22. Who abolished the death penalty in the Philippines?​

Answer:

Si Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo

23. Should death penalty be legalized in the philippines?

Answer:Death penalty should not be legalized.

Explanation:  Everyone deserves second chance. Moreover, Philippines' justice can be bought by money. It is not justifiable to those who are suspected with crimes, yet are not the ones who really commit the crime.

It is not also good for those street people who rely on robbery and drug selling, since they are not given care and concern.

Answer:

Yes if there are more sins of the philippines there will be death penalty i agree

Explanation:

This is the chance to kill all bad person

24. are you in favor of death penalty in the Philippines ​

No, because everyone have an ability to change themselves or make a change for everyone despite of their mistakes we don't have any rights to kill anyone and we can never tell if that person is innocent or not because sometimes our equal equal judgement is not prevailed

25. List of people sentenced to death penalty philippines

Servillano Aquino,Sarah Balabagan,Ferdinand Marcos,Paco Larranaga,Mary Jane Veloso.this is the list of people sentenced to death.
                                                                                                 

26. why death penalty should be imposed in the philippine

For me it should be imposed because lots of criminals  doesn't learn from their mistakes and in some cases they are able to pay bail

27. is death penalty totally abolished in philippines​

Answer:

For years, the Philippines put people to death, particularly in cases of so-called heinous crimes. But President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, under pressure from the Catholic Church, abolished the death penalty in 2006.

•Philippines death penalty

-For years, the Philippines put people to death, particularly in cases of so-called heinous crimes. But President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, under pressure from the Catholic Church, abolished the death penalty in 2006.

+The plummeting human rights situation in the Philippines got even worse this week as the government began considering bills to reinstate the death penalty. The move by the House Committee on Justice came a week after President Rodrigo Duterte used his State of the Nation Address to call for capital punishment by lethal injection for drug offenders.For years, the Philippines put people to death, particularly in cases of so-called heinous crimes. But President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo, under pressure from the Catholic Church, abolished the death penalty in 2006. Human Rights Watch opposes the death penalty in all circumstances because it is inherently cruel and irreversible.In 2007, the Philippines ratified the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which requires countries to abolish the death penalty. Countries that are parties to the covenant and the protocol cannot reinstate the death penalty without violating their obligations under international human rights law. Doing so would also likely result in more than just statements of concern from foreign trade partners such as the European Union.The Duterte government’s overwhelming majority in Congress and continuing efforts to promote its campaign against illegal drugs means the justice committee is likely to support death penalty bills. Duterte’s “war on drugs” has resulted in the deaths of more than 6,000 persons at the hands of the Philippine National Police and thousands more by unidentified gunmen. Accountability for these police killings, including those that victimized children, is practically nonexistent.Adopting the death penalty will mean spilling more blood in the name of Duterte’s “drug war.” It will lead the Philippines to descend further into a rights-violating abyss. And the government will lose credibility and leverage to negotiate on behalf of Filipinos who face execution abroad.Along with the Philippines’ withdrawal from the International Criminal Court in March 2019 and its human rights disinformation campaign at the United Nations Human Rights Council, reimposing the death penalty would only serve to further cement the country’s growing reputation as an international human rights pariah.

PlS report if its incorrect ❤️

#CARRYONLEARNING

#LETSSTUDY

28. Do you agree death penalty in the philippines?

Answer:

no!

death penalty violates the most fundamental human right

29. what is the positive benefits of death penalty in the Philippines?  

People will be scared to commit crimes for their punishments are harsh. In other words, people can be disciplined easily.

30. is Death penalty be re-imposed in the Philippines?​

Answer:

NO.

hindi pa po inap probahan ni pangulong digong ang death penalty

Answer:

no

Explanation:

hindi pa naipatutupad ang death penalty